Revenue Recognition for Contractors – Actually, It Will Affect You

The impact of revenue recognition on contractors

Over the last several months, our conversations with contractors about the new revenue recognition standard have typically started with their assertion that “it’s not going to affect us.” By and large, they are correct with the overall mechanics of revenue recognition. In fact, the new standard generally brings the rest of the world onto the same revenue recognition model that construction contractors have been using for decades – percentage of completion. However, there are nuances to the new standard that must be addressed by every contractor and are very different than current practice.

Change Orders

Many contractors take a very conservative approach when it comes to change orders by not recognizing the change order until all approvals have been obtained and the ink is dry. However, under the new standard, change orders should be recognized once the scope of work has been agreed to, either orally or written. If the price is still under negotiation or unknown, the contractor must determine a price to assign to the change order using the methods prescribed by the standard.

Performance Bonuses/Penalties, Incentives, Liquidated Damages and Claims

Under the new standard, contract bonuses and incentives must be examined on an ongoing basis. The new standard also addresses variable compensation arrangements. Rather than waiting until the end of the job, management must estimate the project’s status and record a projected bonus/penalty at each reporting period. Claims and liquidated damages follow a similar approach under the variable compensation guidance.

Uninstalled Materials

Under the new standard, materials that are specific and custom to the project, but not yet installed, cannot have profit recognized on them. Only revenue up to cost (zero profit) may be recognized. This is meant to more closely follow the true project completion timeline and discourage manipulation of earnings.

Multiple Arrangements

Much has been said and written about performance obligations and whether one contract should be separated into multiple contracts. There is certainly quite a bit of judgment required in this area, but contracts and change orders should be carefully examined on the front end, to determine how they should be accounted for. Certain contracts call for the initial build, as well as required servicing and inspection over a defined period. In this case, the total contract price must be allocated between the two performance obligations.

Financial Statement Impacts

The new standard has updated some of the verbiage on the balance sheet and requires additional footnotes that describe and detail the revenue streams and the recognition methodologies. Retention, while still an asset, may be presented as a contract asset rather than a receivable, depending on the contingency requirements. Certain contract costs may be capitalized as a contract asset and expensed over the life of the contract should they meet certain criteria. Underbillings and overbillings will now be titled as contract assets and contract liabilities. It is important that you discuss and understand these changes with your professional advisors so that you can educate the users of the financial statements.

The standard became effective January 1, 2019, so now is the time to evaluate the contracts in progress at the end of 2018 in order to determine the impact on 2019. It is also important that new contracts are evaluated by individuals familiar with the standard in preparation for the 2019 financial statements.

You might be surprised, but the new standard will affect you. If you have questions or would like to see how the new revenue recognition rules affect you, please contact us.

About the Author

TIMOTHY VAN COTT
CPA, CFA

Director, Certified Public Accountants & Advisors

Tim is a director at Sikich with more than 12 years of experience and serves as the point person for clients and audit engagement team members. He is both a Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Financial Analyst. Drawing from this wide base of education and experience, Tim concentrates his efforts on audits and reviews of construction contractors, employee benefit plans, and manufacturing and distribution companies.

Related Partners

By |2019-02-14T08:11:57+00:00January 31st, 2019|Accounting|0 Comments

About the Author:

Sikich LLP
Sikich is a leading professional services firm specializing in accounting, technology and advisory services. For over 30 years, Sikich has been helping clients focus on overall business growth and the components that result in building the bottom line. Sikich has more than 750 associates and has been ranked as one of the country’s 30 largest accounting firms and among the top one percent of all enterprise resource planning solution partners in the world.
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors for specific advice.

Privacy Information

We use cookies to personalize the website for you and to analyze the use of our website. Click 'Privacy Options' to configure how we can interact with you and your device or computer.

Privacy policy | Close
Settings
private equity services construction accountants Agriculture Services Construction Services Non-Profit Services Government Services