Manufacturers are often too familiar with the struggles between the shop floor and the back office, particularly when it comes to manufacturing costing. One of the main issues contributing to those challenges is overhead costs, including how they are calculated and the logic behind those calculations. The proliferation of advanced manufacturing strategies and technologies has made it difficult to trace manufacturing overhead directly to any particular product or product class. While there are multiple approaches manufacturers can take toward costing, all approaches may result in different data elements and calculations, thus leaving the issue unresolved.
I recently wrote an article for Manufacturing Business Technology discussing the primary methods used for costing and how the conflict can be resolved. The article highlights that the primary difference in the results obtained from these various costing methodology boils down to how overheads (direct and indirect) are absorbed into the cost calculation equation. In addition, it explores some of the unintended consequences that manifest themselves when these various costing methods become part of the performance management system for a production operation. An example of this is how performance metrics derived from a traditional approach to transactionally derived manufacturing costing can lead to incorrect decision making, especially when the operation is attempting to leverage a time-based manufacturing system such as Just-in-Time or Lean Manufacturing.
A different approach to costing methods embeds time factors into the equation. This new costing methodology allows manufacturers to resolve some of the common issues that manifest themselves in more traditional approaches. A key tenet of this alternative approach is using cycle time as a basis of overhead allocation rather than basing this on labor or material costs as is the case in traditional costing practices.
With cycle time based cost accounting, the less time consumed in a productive process the lower the overhead value applied to a calculated cost and vice versa. By focusing on the cost associated with throughput times to produce a given product, this approach adapts managerial costing to what matters most in a modern manufacturing environment―time efficiencies―as opposed to less meaningful measures such as overhead absorption rates versus direct labor.
Overall, costing continues to be a challenge for manufacturers. It’s important to take a closer look at the current method and data generated to ensure the business’s competitiveness and overall health in a global marketplace.
This publication contains general information only and Sikich is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or any other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should you use it as a basis for any decision, action or omission that may affect you or your business. Before making any decision, taking any action or omitting an action that may affect you or your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. In addition, this publication may contain certain content generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) language model. You acknowledge that Sikich shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by you or any person who relies on this publication.
About the Author
Al Galinot
Al Galinot has more than 25 years of manufacturing management experience in large-scale enterprise resource planning (ERP) manufacturing systems, including design and installation. He works closely with clients to ensure the success of their ERP investment, and his real-world knowledge with growing national and international companies makes him a valuable asset to navigating the challenges and intricacies of any critical project.
Sign up for Insights
Join 14,000+ Business executives and decision makers.
Latest Insights
Dynamics 365>Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain Management
Smarter Production, Leaner Manufacturing Operations: The Cas...
June 9, 2025
Article
On Demand – Internal Controls For Fraud Prevention in ...
May 22, 2025
Case Study
Global Manufacturing Firm Modernizes Sales Operations with S...
May 19, 2025
Manufacturing
Demand-Driven Material Requirements Planning: A Smarter Appr...
April 23, 2025
Manufacturing
Quality Management Systems: Enhancing Compliance in Manufact...
April 23, 2025
Dynamics 365>Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain Management
Outside Production Processing for Sheet Metal Coils in Dynam...
April 17, 2025
Dynamics 365>Dynamics 365 Finance and Supply Chain Management
Customizations: Managing the Human Element in Production Pla...
April 10, 2025
Manufacturing
Ensuring Supply Chain Compliance in Manufacturing
April 2, 2025
Sikich On Demand
On Demand – 2025 Economic Update for Manufacturers
March 28, 2025
Manufacturing
Assembly Lines of Defense: Internal Controls in Manufacturin...
March 17, 2025