https://www.sikich.com

Shifting Left in Software Development: Reducing Risk Through Early Testing

Kaliaperumal Karuppaiya

Sep 22 2025

3 min read

In the race to efficiently deliver the highest quality software, one principle continues to rise above the rest: Shift Left Testing. Far more than a buzzword, it’s a strategic mindset that brings testing earlier into the development lifecycle, helping teams catch issues sooner and reduce downstream risks. By pairing this approach with automated testing, organizations not only accelerate feedback loops but also drive greater efficiency—enabling faster, more resilient, and higher-quality software delivery.

What Does “Shift Left” Really Mean?

Traditionally, testing has been treated as a final checkpoint—often reduced to a “check-the-box” exercise performed after development, usually under tight deadlines. Shifting Left represents a fundamental change: bringing exploratory testing into the earliest stages of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC), beginning with requirements and design. With the addition of automated testing, teams can continuously validate functionality against business expectations throughout development, thereby catching defects early, accelerating feedback, and preventing costly delays later in the process.

By integrating testing into every stage of development, teams can:

Detect defects early
Reduce rework
Improve collaboration
Accelerate delivery

The Shift-Left Methodology and Automated Testing: A Quick Breakdown

Here’s how shift-left testing plays out in practice:

Requirements – Use automated checks to confirm that requirements are clear, measurable, and tied to acceptance criteria.
Design – Apply automated tools for code quality checks and architecture validation before development begins.
Development – Leverage unit tests, test-driven development (TDD), and automated integration testing to catch issues as code is written.
Build & Deploy – Run automated regression suites and performance tests to ensure new changes don’t break existing functionality or slow the system down.

This proactive approach aligns perfectly with Agile and DevOps-based methodologies, where speed and quality must go hand in hand.

Risk Reduction Starts Early

The cost of fixing a bug increases exponentially the later it’s found. A defect caught during requirements analysis can cost significantly less than one discovered in Production. Shifting left helps mitigate risk by:

Preventing defects, not just detecting them
Shortening feedback loops
Improving code quality from day one
Reducing technical debt and deployment anxiety

Automated Testing: The Backbone of Shift-Left Success

Manual testing alone can’t keep pace with today’s development cycles. That’s where automated testing becomes essential. By integrating automated testing throughout the development process, teams gain:

Real-time validation of every code change
Faster regression cycles
Continuous performance and security monitoring
Confidence to release frequently and safely

Industry-leading automated testing solutions like Tricentis Tosca make it possible to test early, often, and intelligently.

Final Thought: Shift Left Is a Culture, Not Just a Practice

Shifting left is a paradigm shift; it requires cross-functional collaboration, shared ownership of quality, and a commitment to building software that works the first time.

If your team is still testing manually at the tail end of development, it may be time to rethink your testing strategy. The earlier you test, the earlier you learn, and the more resilient your software becomes.

Let’s stop treating testing as a final hurdle and start embracing it as a continuous enabler of innovation.

Reach out to the ITQ&C team or your Sikich engagement manager to schedule an automated testing discovery session.

This publication contains general information only and Sikich is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or any other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should you use it as a basis for any decision, action or omission that may affect you or your business. Before making any decision, taking any action or omitting an action that may affect you or your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. In addition, this publication may contain certain content generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) language model. You acknowledge that Sikich shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by you or any person who relies on this publication.

About the Author

Kaliaperumal Karuppaiya

Kaliaperumal Karuppaiya (KP) is a Senior Validation Analyst with over 11 years of experience in the life sciences, pharmaceutical, and clinical validation domains. He brings deep expertise in Computer System Validation (CSV) and is well-versed in the Computer Software Assurance (CSA) approach, enabling risk-based, efficient validation strategies aligned with modern regulatory expectations. KP is certified in Tosca, a leading test automation tool, which he leverages to streamline testing processes and enhance validation outcomes. Known for his precision and collaborative mindset, KP is passionate about continuous improvement and driving innovation in validation practices.